Let us at least be honest about what we are talking about. You do not really want to discuss the legality of immigration. If you did then we could discuss raising the quota and other methods to make immigration from Mexico to this country more "legal."
If the legality of the issue was first and foremost on your mind one would think that you would be equally as vociferous towards other illegal pursuits such as speeding, cheating on taxes, or having an unlicensed dog. But the legality or illegality of this issue is not what bothers you. It is immigration itself.
When you desire to discuss the causes and solutions of immigration in a reasonable and rational manner just say the word. I'll be waiting. Peace

You are right. My concern is that the flood of spanish speaking illegal aliens are dictating our immigration quotas, not US immigration. The total disregard and disrespect of our national boundries is unacceptable.

"When you desire to discuss the causes and solutions of immigration in a reasonable and rational manner just say the word."

First, the issue is not immigration. Immigration is not a problem, I love and embrace the immigrant; it is illegal aliens. Why do you insist on misrepresenting when you know beter?

Second, your statement implies I an unreasonable and irrational, conclusions that do not address a specific issue. From my viewpoint it is you who are unreasonable and irrational.

Third, I support speed limits as it protects those who drive in a safe manner from those who would run us over if given a chance.

Fourth, cheating on taxes. I don't cheat, your comment suggests you do. Since too many illegals are paid under the table they also don't pay taxes. To legalize the illegal would allow foreign countries to dictate our immigration quotas. What is your problem with a sovereign nation establishing immigration laws? Do you oppose visas and passports, too?

You underestimate the value of the rule of law. Your support of anarchy is puzzling. Why do anarchists so covet amnesty since they oppose the rule of law? It's obvious that you oppose trespassing laws (unless it''s your house, I'd wager).

Again, Mexico enforces it's imigration laws at it's southern border, why shouldn't we?

Rhodes,

No sense arguing with the norske. He disagrees and bashes anyone whose opinions differ from his own. He always has his soapbox at the ready. Even if you made a good argument, he would still find fault with it. You know how those intellectual liberal elitist's are.